Case in Point | CMRG | Patient Advocacy | OR Manager | DecisionBriefs Monday, May 20, 2013
Case Management

Case In Point | CMRG | Continuing Education | Trends | Clinical | Best Practice | Reports | Awards | Jobs | Store

Sign up for Dorland Health
news sent to your inbox
Facebook Twitter Linked in Google+ RSS
Case in Point
Publications
Dorland Store
Webinars
Continuing Education
Awards
Conferences and Events
Jobs
Advertise
Case Management

Reminder: Observation Does Not Equal Admission
By Jackie Birmingham, RN, MS
December 12, 2011

Paying close attention to the fundamentals of admitting and the three-midnight rule has a direct impact on your patients’ health-care coverage and access to post-acute services, as well as on patient-satisfaction ratings for your facility.
 
A Center for Medicare Advocacy class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) challenges the use of observation status and underscores the importance of making a timely, correct assessment of a patient’s status — observation or inpatient.
 
The CMA filed suit on behalf of seven patients from Connecticut, Massachusetts and Texas who were admitted to observation status, stayed in the hospital for three or more days and then went to skilled-nursing facilities without the three-midnight inpatient qualifying stay. The patients were therefore billed for services that would otherwise have been paid under the Medicare Part A.
 
Implications for Hospitals and Post-Acute Providers
 
Until or unless Medicare policy is changed in the courts or Congress, this case, Bagnall v. Sebelius, is a stark reminder that timing is money. For patients and for providers. Patients hit with unexpected bills (that they might not be able to pay) will not score their experience of care well, opening the door for reimbursement penalties. So, it’s important that:
  • Hospital staff, not consultants, assign status. Hospitals that outsource the review of patient data and the classification of inpatient or observation status should stop that practice. After-the-fact decisions by outsiders aren’t always correct. Hospital physicians, case managers and utilization-review nurses should be the ones making these admission decisions, because they are the ones assessing the patient’s needs.
  • Case managers monitor observation statuses. Case managers, using the hospital's preferred criteria set, should assess patients admitted to observation status a minimum of every eight hours at the beginning and end of each shift. This should happen before 11 p.m. since the inpatient admission three-day clock starts at midnight.
  • Post-acute providers get necessary information up front. When reviewing referrals, be sure to get the patient’s admission classification status and current length of stay. If the patient was classified under observation status and didn’t meet the three-midnight minimum, make sure the hospital has discussed the financial implications with the patient and family before accepting the placement.
 
CMA: It’s an Access-to-Coverage Issue
 
Characterizing observation status as “harmful,” the CMA lawsuit stems from patient complaints that entire hospital stays, some as long as 14 days, were classified by the hospital as observation. In some instances, the plaintiffs’ physicians ordered their admission, but the hospital retroactively reversed the decision. As a consequence, patients were charged for various acute-care services they received, including prescription medications. They were also charged for their entire subsequent SNF stay, having never satisfied the statutory three-day hospital stay requirement.
 
“It causes severe financial problems for beneficiaries and their families, and deprives them of nursing home coverage altogether," said Judith Stein, founder and executive director of the CMA, in a news release.
 
The CMA argues that observation days should count toward the three-day qualifier.
 

Jackie Birmingham, RN, MS, is vice president, emeritus, of clinical leadership at Curaspan Health Group. This article reprinted with permission. See the original article on Curaspan’s site.

Tell us what you think...

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image. (refresh)
 
 

RELATED ARTICLES

The 11 Components of Project RED
At Boston Medical Center, researchers have developed a groundbreaking discharge planning process known as Project Re-Engineered Discharge, or Project RED. Supported by grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and...

A Guide to Referrals
What case managers need to know about referring physicians and post-acute providers Discharge planners and case managers may encounter physicians who insist upon making referrals to specific post-acute providers. These physicians may...

An Effective Case Model
Case management and behavioral health In 2007 the HIP Health Plan of New York restructured its case management program for clients at highest risk of re-hospitalization for psychiatric conditions to capitalize on previ- ous lessons...



Article Toolbox

CASE MANAGEMENT RESOURCE GUIDE

 

CONTINUING EDUCATION

NEW! The Essence of Case Management

This e-learning course brings it all together. It explores venues where case managers are practicing; looks at legislative activities that impact the practice; and discusses tools and principles utilized by case managers across the broad healthcare landscape. Earn CEs »

MOST READ STORIES
Integrated Case Management
Healthcare Goes Mobile
The Aging Family
Transitioning Complex Patients From the ICU
JOBS
Oceanside, NY
South Nassau Communities Hospital
Lansing, MI
Sparrow Health System
Bellevue, WA
Healthcare Management Administrators
Brooklyn, NY
Center for Urban Community Services
Denton, TX
Texas Health Resources
Bellevue, WA
Healthcare Management Administrators
Tulsa, OK
The University Of Oklahoma
Job Seekers: View All Jobs | Post a Resume
Employers: Post a Job | Search Resumes